Mapping Specialisation and Fragmentation of Regulatory Bodies

The objective of the Flemish database is to determine the current level of proliferation of regulatory bodies and to map how regulatory regimes are structured (i.e. what kind of organizations are involved and what are their characteristics?). This paper explores whether there are ‘groups’ of regulators who share certain characteristics with other members of the same group, but differ from other groups. In specific, we test whether the sector in which a body is active and the level of government to which it belongs, have an impact on the organisational form of the body and the tasks it performs. We find that economic regulators differ significantly from other areas. They are more insulated from politicians, are more specialised and seem to have a relatively strong legal mandate. The level of government seems to be a relevant explanatory factor as well. Federal bodies are more insulated from government than other levels. In addition, they are more specialised in regulation and have a rather limited legal mandate. The results confirm the relevance of comparing different regulatory areas and levels of government.

Private security companies and private military companies: a comparative and economical analysis

This book constructs theoretical models of how States can cope with the increased interest in private security, provides a functional breakdown of “police services” as we understand the term now, and examines the entry barriers several Western jurisdictions have imposed on the companies that are willing to provide these different police functions on a private basis. Lastly, a new input is given to a fairly unexplored market segment: a combination of a security contract with an insurance contract. In a separate chapter, the book touches upon the concept of private military companies. One specific subset of these can be closely linked to the private security industry. When contracted by State agencies, challenges are encountered that also exist with other public-private contracts, but in a more exasperated way. The author proposes some methods, using existing instruments, to minimise costs, maximise benefits, and increase accountability to the benefit of both the State and the company

Autonomy and Coordination in Multi-actor Multi-level Constellations. Case Study of Energy Regulators in Belgium

status: publishe

Kwaliteit in Bewakingsopdrachten (1ste tussentijds rapport)

nrpages: 48status: publishe

Kwaliteit in Bewakingsopdrachten - Eindrapport

nrpages: 124status: publishe

Kwaliteit in Bewakingsopdrachten (2de tussentijds rapport)

nrpages: 146status: publishe

Kwaliteit in bewakingsopdrachten (3de tussentijds rapport)

nrpages: 156status: publishe

Measuring Multi-Level Regulatory Governance: Organizational proliferation, coordination, and concentration of influence

As regulation increasingly results from the interplay of a wide array of different actors operating at different levels, it has become crucial to focus on how these constellations of regulatory actors operate. Although this research field presents huge potential for theoretical development, we still lack the measurement techniques to allow systematic comparative research. We contribute to filling this gap with four indices measuring crucial characteristics of multi-actor regulatory arrangements: (i) the scope of organizational proliferation; (ii) the extent of coordination between regulatory actors; (iii) the amount of influence that each individual regulatory actor has on the sector regulation; and (iv) the extent to which the regulatory influence is concentrated in the hands of one or a few actors. We argue that our indices are sufficiently systematic, reliable, and flexible to be applied in a variety of research contexts relating to multi-level and multi-actor regulatory governance

Measuring multi-level regulatory governance : organizational proliferation, coordination, and concentration of influence

As regulation increasingly results from the interplay of a wide array of different actors operating at different levels, it has become crucial to focus on how these constellations of regulatory actors operate. Although this research field presents huge potential for theoretical development, we still lack the measurement techniques to allow systematic comparative research. We contribute to filling this gap with four indices measuring crucial characteristics of multi-actor regulatory arrangements: (i) the scope of organizational proliferation; (ii) the extent of coordination between regulatory actors; (iii) the amount of influence that each individual regulatory actor has on the sector regulation; and (iv) the extent to which the regulatory influence is concentrated in the hands of one or a few actors. We argue that our indices are sufficiently systematic, reliable, and flexible to be applied in a variety of research contexts relating to multi-level and multi-actor regulatory governance

Mapping specialisation and fragmentation of regulatory bodies

status: publishe